Deal flow at the Covid trough
Mid-market private-debt activity dipped but did not seize. Lenders that pulled back on new deals stayed open to existing borrowers, and the buyout share of the book actually rose.
- Dated
- 22 October 2020
- Desk note
- Dated to the data
- Reading
- 7 min
- Series
- The quarter in debt
Managing Director
The Covid downturn dipped mid-market private-debt activity without seizing it. Across Deloitte’s alternative-lender panel, completed deals in the year to autumn 2020 eased to 447 from 484 a year earlier, a single-digit fall, not a stop. And within that smaller book the buyout share rose to 67% and UK unitranche to 64%. Lenders did not withdraw capital; they concentrated it on quality. For a borrower with a clean story, the market stayed open.
This is the desk’s periodic stock-take, written at what looks like the low point of the year. It is not a forecast. It is a reading of where the market actually sits, drawn from the data the major houses have published and re-expressed in our own terms. The single best public gauge of mid-market direct-lending activity is Deloitte’s Alternative Lender Deal Tracker, a running survey of the leading European private-debt funds. Its two 2020 editions, taken together, tell a clear story: a real, selective slowdown, not a freeze.
How far did deal flow actually fall?
Less than the headlines of spring 2020 would have led anyone to fear. On a trailing-twelve-month basis the panel completed 447 deals in the year to autumn 2020, against 484 in the year to spring, a fall of under 8%. The pressure was concentrated in the first half of the year: half-year deal counts stepped down from the second half of 2019 into the first half of 2020, the window when the pandemic first hit dealmaking. The line below traces that descent into the trough.
Deal flow eased into the first-half 2020 trough. The fall was orderly, not a stop.
| Half-year | Deals |
|---|---|
| H1 ’19 | 287 |
| H1 ’19 | 197 |
| H1 ’19 | 140 |
- Private-debt deals per half-year
Half-year count of completed UK and European private-debt deals across the alternative-lender panel. H2 2019 (197) and H1 2020 (140) are the two half-year totals stated in the Autumn 2020 edition's deal panel. H1 2019 (287) is derived, full-year 2019 (484, per the Spring 2020 edition) less the reported H2 2019 half, and is marked illustrative. The panel is a survey of participating lenders, not a census.
Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker, Spring 2020 & Autumn 2020 editions; Solon analysis
Two things are worth reading in that chart. The first is that the decline is a slope, not a cliff: deals kept completing throughout, even in the worst quarter. The second is what it does not show: a wave of defaults or forced exits. Lenders that pulled back on new underwriting largely stayed constructive with the borrowers already on their books, extending covenant headroom and short amendments rather than calling facilities. The reduction was in new-deal appetite, and even that was partial.
447
Alternative-lender deals completed in the year to autumn 2020, down from 484 a year earlier, a fall of under 8%. Activity eased; it did not seize.
Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker, Autumn 2020
Where did the capital that kept moving go?
Into quality, and the composition of the book shows it plainly. As total volume fell, the share of deals funding a buyout did not fall with it; it rose, from 64% in the spring edition to 67% by autumn. That is a composition effect worth understanding. In an uncertain market the marginal deals are the first to pause: the opportunistic refinancing, the event-driven raise. Sponsor-backed buyouts, underwritten and equity-supported, keep completing. The surviving book skews toward the credits lenders trust most.
Buyout share of the book rose to 67% as volumes fell; capital went to sponsor-backed quality.
| Edition | Buyout share (%) |
|---|---|
| Spring 2020 | 64% |
| Autumn 2020 | 67% |
- Buyout share of deals
Share of UK and European alternative-lender deals used to fund a buyout, as reported in each edition's deal-purpose panel. Spring 2020 = 64%; Autumn 2020 = 67%. Both are stated figures. The remainder funds refinancings, recapitalisations and growth.
Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker, Spring 2020 & Autumn 2020 editions
The structure mix tells the same story from a different angle. Unitranche, the single blended senior facility from one lender in place of a syndicated senior-plus-mezzanine stack, took a larger share of UK deals at the trough, rising from 58% to 64%. When conditions tighten, borrowers and lenders both reach for the simpler, faster, single-counterparty package. Complexity is a luxury of calm markets; certainty of execution is what a 2020 process was buying.
Unitranche took two-thirds of UK structures: the simple single-lender package gained share through the trough.
| Edition | UK unitranche share (%) |
|---|---|
| Spring 2020 | 58% |
| Autumn 2020 | 64% |
- UK unitranche share of structures
Share of UK alternative-lender deals structured as unitranche (a single blended senior facility), as reported in each edition's structure panel. Spring 2020 = 58%; Autumn 2020 = 64%. Both are stated figures for the UK; the European share sat lower, around 50% in both editions.
Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker, Spring 2020 & Autumn 2020 editions
A downturn makes the market more selective, not closed: the capital goes to the borrower who arrives with a credit story a lender can underwrite quickly.
What the trough meant for a £3–15m borrower
The practical reading is not the reassuring one that “the market was fine”. It plainly tightened. It is that the tightening was selective, and selectivity is something a borrower can act on. The deals that completed in 2020 were the ones where the lender could see the cash generation, the equity backing or the collateral clearly enough to move at speed. The deals that stalled were rarely bad businesses; they were businesses that could not yet tell that story cleanly under pressure.
None of which changes the desk’s standing advice, because the advice was never about the cycle. Run a competitive process across the whole field of lenders. In a selective market the dispersion between the keenest and the most cautious quote widens, and that is where the value sits. Prepare the credit story before you need it, so you can move at a lender’s speed rather than your own. And treat a downturn as a sorting mechanism, not a closed door: the capital is still there, and it is looking for exactly the borrower who shows up ready.
Questions a CFO asks
Common questions
- Did private-debt lenders stop doing deals in the 2020 downturn?
- No. Activity eased rather than stopped. Across the Deloitte alternative-lender panel, completed deals in the year to autumn 2020 fell to 447 from 484 a year earlier, a single-digit decline, not a shutdown. The first half of 2020 was the low point, and even then the funds kept deploying, concentrating on sponsor-backed buyouts and clean credits rather than withdrawing.
- Could a mid-market company still raise debt during the Covid trough?
- A business with a clean credit story could, yes. Lenders became more selective. The rise in buyout and unitranche shares shows capital flowing to the more predictable, sponsor-backed end of the market. But they were open. A company that could evidence resilient cash generation still had a market; the harder credits waited. The difference between the two was preparation, not the state of the cycle.
- Why did the buyout share of deals rise while total volume fell?
- Because the deals that fell away were the marginal ones. In an uncertain market, opportunistic refinancings and event-driven raises are the first to pause, while sponsor-led buyouts, underwritten and backed by equity, keep completing. So the surviving book skews toward buyouts even as the count shrinks. It is a composition effect, and it tells a borrower where the lending appetite actually sat.