The year the recovery stuck
A full-year read on a recovering market. Private-debt deal counts climbed back toward cycle highs, debt funds held a commanding share of UK mid-cap finance, and the deal book tilted back toward LBOs and bolt-ons after a bruising 2023.
- Dated
- 21 November 2024
- Desk note
- Dated to the data
- Reading
- 7 min
- Series
- The quarter in debt
Managing Director
Private-debt deal flow recovered to 702 in the year to Autumn 2024, up from the 593-deal rate-shock trough and closing in on the 2022 high of 871. Debt funds held 77% of UK mid-cap transactions in the first half of the year, M&A activity led the book, and UK deal pace in H1 2024 already exceeded half the full 2023 total. 2024 confirmed the thesis: good credit gets financed across the rate cycle, not only in the cheap years.
This is the desk’s annual stock-take of the lower-mid-market debt environment, drawn from the data the major houses had published by the close of 2024. It is not a forecast. Three questions frame the read: did deal flow recover; who supplied it; and what does the composition of the book tell a borrower planning for 2025?
Did the market actually recover in 2024?
Yes, on the primary measure. Deloitte’s tracker, the closest thing the European private-debt market has to a headcount of actual transactions, reported 702 deals in the trailing twelve months to its Autumn 2024 edition, up from 593 in the prior Spring reading. That is the first half-year improvement since 2022, and it takes deal flow back above the 2023 reading, if still below the 2022 peak of 871. The 2023 dip, caused by the fastest rate-tightening cycle in forty years, did not erase the long-run direction; it interrupted it.
The recovery is confirmed: deal flow climbed from 593 to 702 in the year to Autumn 2024, off a 2022 high of 871.
| Edition | Deals (TTM) |
|---|---|
| '21.2916666666667 | 385 |
| '21.7916666666667 | 578 |
| '22.2916666666667 | 785 |
| '22.7916666666667 | 871 |
| '23.7916666666667 | 600 |
| '24.2916666666667 | 593 |
| '24.7916666666667 | 702 |
- Private-debt deals, trailing twelve months
Trailing-twelve-month European private-debt deal count from the headline figure on the cover of each edition. The Spring 2021 trough (385) and Autumn 2024 peak (702) are the two load-bearing anchors of the cycle narrative; all other points are hard from their respective edition cover pages. Spring 2023 is omitted; that edition did not publish a clean TTM total.
Source · Deloitte Private Debt Deal Tracker (Europe), Autumn 2024, with prior editions back to Spring 2021
The shape of that chart is worth reading carefully. The trough was not a collapse: deal flow fell from 871 to a low of 593, roughly a third off the peak, before recovering. And the recovery was not driven by rate cuts alone: the first leg, from 600 to 593 in Spring 2024, was essentially flat, and then the Autumn 2024 jump to 702 landed before the Bank Rate had moved materially below 5%. Capital found its way back into the market before the rate cycle completed. That is what a structural supply story looks like.
702
Trailing-twelve-month European private-debt deals in the Autumn 2024 edition of the Deloitte tracker, up from the 593-deal trough in Spring 2024 and from 600 in Autumn 2023. The 2022 peak was 871.
Source · Deloitte Private Debt Deal Tracker, Autumn 2024
Who is supplying the UK mid-market?
Debt funds, overwhelmingly. On Houlihan Lokey’s UK-specific read, debt funds financed 77% of UK mid-cap transactions in each of the first two quarters of 2024, the same high-water mark the UK set when the recovery began. Banks regained some share through 2023, when rate volatility kept fund pricing wide and clearing banks competed hard on margin; that episode appears to have been a tactical skirmish rather than a structural shift. By 2024, the structural picture was reasserted.
UK mid-cap deal pace in H1 2024 already exceeded half the 2023 full year; the recovery is running ahead of the annual rate.
| Period | Transactions |
|---|---|
| FY 2022 | 228 |
| FY 2023 | 200 |
| H1 2024 | 102 |
- H1 2024 transaction pace
Total UK mid-cap debt transactions (senior + unitranche) per period. FY2022 (228) and FY2023 (200) are stated full-year totals from the Q4 2023 deck (cdn.hl.com). H1 2024 (102) is the sum of Q1 (47) and Q2 (55), both hard from the Q1 and Q2 2024 decks; the H1 total is our arithmetic. The H1 2024 column is a half-year count, not a comparable full-year figure.
Source · Houlihan Lokey MidCapMonitor — Q4 2023, Q1 2024 and Q2 2024 editions
The H1 2024 column in the chart above shows 102 transactions across the first two quarters: 47 in Q1 and 55 in Q2, both hard from the Houlihan Lokey decks. That is a half-year count, not directly comparable to the FY2022 and FY2023 full-year figures beside it. Six months at 102 deals already put 2024 on course to exceed 2023’s 200-transaction full year.
The UK’s position within European private debt has also been broadly stable. Through all the editions of the Deloitte tracker from 2020 to 2024, the UK has accounted for roughly a third of cumulative European private-debt activity, a share that held even as the European market itself grew from 2,272 to 5,250 cumulative deals. The pool that a UK borrower can run a process across is materially larger than it was four years ago, and the UK slice of that pool has held its weight.
What the deal book says about 2025
The composition matters as much as the volume. Through the rate-shock years, the mix tilted toward refinancings: companies managing existing debt rather than using it to grow. As 2024 progressed, M&A-led activity returned: Autumn 2024 showed 70% of deals M&A-focused, and the LBO and bolt-on categories led the count. Refinancing, while still a meaningful slice of the book, was no longer dominating it.
A market led by acquisitions rather than refinancings is a market with appetite. Lenders closing LBOs and bolt-ons are actively deploying and looking for their next deal.
For a lower-mid-market company not in a PE-backed transaction, the practical implication is the same as it has been throughout this series. The pool of lenders is larger, it is active, and it needs to deploy. A borrower approaching the market in 2025, whether for a growth facility, a refinancing or an acquisition line, is not arriving at a moment of scarcity. The constraint is on the credit story, not the capital.
The one note of caution runs in parallel. The 2026 maturity wall is building: the Covid loans drawn in 2020 hit final maturity in 2026, and the Bank of England had already flagged roughly 30% of UK leveraged-loan debt as due by end-2025. For a borrower with a facility maturing in 2026, the refinancing calendar is a 2024 or early 2025 problem: the lead time for a properly run process is twelve to eighteen months. A recovering market is a better negotiating environment. Use it while the choice is yours.
Questions a CFO asks
Common questions
- Does the 2024 recovery mean credit is freely available for any business?
- No. The recovery is in deal volume, not underwriting standards. Lenders have returned to competition for the same pool of good credits, and pricing has eased from the 2023 peak. But the credit bar has not moved: a company without a clear earnings story and a credible repayment path will not find this market easier to navigate than 2023. What has changed is that a prepared borrower now faces more lenders competing to win the deal.
- With Bank Rate still above 4%, is it worth raising debt now rather than waiting?
- The answer depends almost entirely on what you are waiting for. If you are waiting for a lower base rate, you are also waiting for the cohort of 2026-maturity borrowers to hit the same lenders at once, and for your negotiating position to deteriorate. The businesses that locked long in 2021 got the cheap rate; the businesses that refinance in 2024 or early 2025, while capacity is returning, get the better terms on everything else: structure, covenants, tenor. Rate is one cost; process is the other.
- Debt funds hold 77% of UK mid-cap transactions. Does that mean banks are not worth approaching?
- The opposite. The point of the 77% figure is that debt funds now provide real competitive pressure. Approaching only banks is searching the minority of supply; approaching only funds misses the transactions where a clearing bank is still the best price for a clean credit. A competitive process puts banks and funds side by side, so neither sets the terms alone. Neither alone gives you the market rate.