Market review

Deal flow held through the rate shock

Despite the fastest rate cycle in a generation, private-debt deal flow reached 871 trailing deals by autumn 2022, up 51% on the Autumn 2021 edition. The tracker itself rebranded, reflecting an asset class that had earned its place in the market.

Dated
25 November 2022
Desk note
Dated to the data
Reading
6 min
Series
The quarter in debt
Gregory Elgunov, Managing Director of Solon Corporate Finance

Managing Director

Gregory Elgunov

Through the fastest rate-tightening cycle since the 1980s, European private-debt deal flow held, and then some. Deloitte’s tracker counted 871 trailing-twelve-month deals in its Autumn 2022 edition, up 51% on a year earlier and close to double the 2020 trough. The tracker itself was renamed “Private Debt Deal Tracker” in that same edition, an institutional acknowledgement that the asset class had ceased to be alternative and become structural.

What happened in the market most people were watching?

The public debt markets had a difficult year. Sterling leveraged loans repriced sharply through 2022, the mini-budget of September wiped a further slice of sentiment, and new issuance in the leveraged-loan and high-yield bond markets became episodic. For a company trying to finance an acquisition or a refinancing, the syndicated route, always more reliable in calmer conditions, narrowed materially in the second half of the year.

The gap this opened in the mid-market was not theoretical. Direct lenders closed it. Unlike a syndicated deal, which requires a clearing market and a group of banks to underwrite distribution risk, a direct-lending transaction closes bilaterally: one fund, one credit committee, one term sheet. That structural difference in execution is why private-debt volume kept running while the public markets stuttered.

Fig. 01

The deal count kept climbing: 871 private-debt transactions in the trailing year, up 51% on the Autumn 2021 edition.

European private-debt deals, trailing twelve months, Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022A line chart of trailing-twelve-month European private-debt deals from Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022. The count falls from 484 (Spring 2020) to a trough of 385 (Spring 2021), then climbs sharply to 578 (Autumn 2021), 785 (Spring 2022) and 871 (Autumn 2022).05001000Spring 2020Spring 2021Autumn 2021Autumn 2022871
Trailing-twelve-month European private-debt deal count per Deloitte edition, Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022.
EditionDeals (TTM)
Spring 2020484
Autumn 2020447
Spring 2021385
Autumn 2021578
Spring 2022785
Autumn 2022871
  • Private-debt deals, trailing twelve months

Trailing-twelve-month European private-debt deal count reported on the front page of each biannual Deloitte edition. The tracker was renamed 'Private Debt Deal Tracker' with the Autumn 2022 edition; the survey methodology is continuous. All points are published actuals, lifted verbatim from the respective PDFs.

Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker / Private Debt Deal Tracker, editions Spring 2020 – Autumn 2022

The chart above shows the full trajectory from the Covid trough. The Spring 2021 reading of 385 trailing deals was the low point of the post-pandemic pause; by Autumn 2022 the count had more than doubled to 871. The direction of travel through the rate shock is the story: the line did not pause in 2022. It accelerated.

871

European private-debt deals in the trailing twelve months to Autumn 2022, up 51% on the Autumn 2021 edition, according to the newly renamed Deloitte Private Debt Deal Tracker.

Source · Deloitte Private Debt Deal Tracker, Autumn 2022

Did European unitranche volumes corroborate the picture?

Yes. Houlihan Lokey’s MidCapMonitor, the most closely followed count of pan-European mid-cap unitranche and senior LBO financings, published quarterly data through Q3 2022 that told a consistent story. After a seasonal Q1 dip to 104 transactions, European unitranche rebounded to 130 in Q2 and held at 129 in Q3. That is within a few per cent of the Q4 2021 peak of 139. Three consecutive quarters into the rate shock, unitranche volumes had not meaningfully broken. The record FY2021 pace (486 European transactions for the full year) was being tracked closely.

Fig. 02

European unitranche held near the 2021 record pace through Q3 2022, shrugging off the rate shock.

Pan-European mid-cap unitranche transactions per quarter, Q4 2021 to Q3 2022A column chart of pan-European mid-cap unitranche deal counts across four quarters: Q4 2021 (139, the prior peak), Q1 2022 (104, seasonal dip), Q2 2022 (130, rebound), Q3 2022 (129, holding the pace). The Q2 and Q3 2022 columns are highlighted.0100139Q4 2021104Q1 2022130Q2 2022129Q3 2022
Pan-European mid-cap unitranche transactions per quarter, Q4 2021 to Q3 2022.
QuarterUnitranche deals
Q4 2021139
Q1 2022104
Q2 2022130
Q3 2022129
  • European mid-cap unitranche transactions

Pan-European mid-cap unitranche deal count per quarter. Q4 2021 (139, the prior peak) and Q1–Q3 2022 (104, 130, 129) are the published figures from HL newsroom releases available by November 2022. The Q3 2022 edition restated Q2 as 135; the Q2 as-first-reported figure of 130 is used here. The FY2021 record (486 total European unitranches) was reported as context in these releases.

Source · Houlihan Lokey MidCapMonitor, Q2 2022 and Q3 2022 newsroom releases

The Q3 2022 edition of the MidCapMonitor restated the Q2 figure upward from 130 to 135 as additional deals were captured; the chart uses the figure as first reported.

What did the structure mix tell us?

The unitranche remained the dominant deal structure in the UK through every point in the 2022 cycle. On Deloitte’s tracker, the UK unitranche share of all private-debt deal structures ran between 58% and 70% across the six editions from Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022, peaking in the record-run Autumn 2021 edition and normalising to 58% by Autumn 2022. In the same period, the European average was running 10 to 14 percentage points lower.

Fig. 03

UK unitranche share normalised from its 2021 peak but remained the dominant structure at 58%.

UK unitranche share of private-debt deal structures, Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022 (per cent)A column chart of the UK unitranche share of all UK private-debt deal structures across six Deloitte editions from Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022. The share peaked at 70% in Autumn 2021 before normalising to 61% (Spring 2022) and 58% (Autumn 2022), the Autumn 2022 column highlighted.0%50%58%Spr 202064%Aut 202063%Spr 202170%Aut 202161%Spr 202258%Aut 2022
UK unitranche share of deal structures per Deloitte edition, Spring 2020 to Autumn 2022 (per cent).
EditionUK unitranche share (%)
Spr 202058%
Aut 202064%
Spr 202163%
Aut 202170%
Spr 202261%
Aut 202258%
  • UK unitranche share of structures

UK unitranche share of all UK alternative-lender / private-debt deal structures per Deloitte edition. The UK has consistently run above the European average; this series reflects the UK-specific cut. All points are hard, lifted verbatim from the structure section of each PDF.

Source · Deloitte Alternative Lender Deal Tracker / Private Debt Deal Tracker, editions Spring 2020 – Autumn 2022

The pattern matters for a lower-mid-market borrower for a specific reason. Unitranche dominance in the UK is partly a size story: the single-tranche structure is proportionally more efficient at smaller deal sizes, where the mechanical overhead of assembling a senior-plus-mezzanine structure is harder to justify. Unitranche share persisted through 2022 even as rates rose and lenders might have been expected to de-risk into simpler senior structures. That is evidence lenders remained willing to offer single-tranche flexibility to the right credits at the smaller end of the market.

What does “certainty of execution” actually mean for a CFO?

It is a phrase that appears in every pitch deck from a direct lender, and in 2022 it acquired data behind it. When the syndicated markets effectively shut for several months in the back half of the year, a company with a time-sensitive transaction (an acquisition with a long-stop date, or a covenant being tested) had two realistic routes: wait for the public market to reopen, or close bilaterally with a direct lender. Many chose the latter. They paid more on the margin. They got the deal done.

In a market where execution certainty is the scarce good, the borrower who has already mapped the direct-lending field does not have to start from zero when time pressure arrives.

The corollary is the one worth internalising now, before conditions tighten further. A CFO who only engages private-debt lenders when the bank says no, or when the syndicated market is closed, arrives late and negotiates from weakness. The borrowers who used 2022 well were those who already had relationships across the direct-lending field and could move to a bilateral close in weeks rather than months. Building that map is ordinary treasury preparation, done before the pressure arrives.

Questions a CFO asks

Common questions

Why did private-debt deal flow hold up when syndicated markets froze in 2022?
Direct lenders do not need a syndicate to clear. Each fund makes its own credit decision, sets its own terms and closes bilaterally. When the leveraged-loan and high-yield markets repriced sharply and new issuance stalled, private debt kept closing because the execution model did not depend on the same clearing mechanism. The certainty-of-close argument for direct lending is easiest to see in years like 2022.
What did the tracker rename from 'alternative lender' to 'private debt' signal?
It was a recognition that the asset class had passed a maturity threshold: “alternative” implies a secondary option; “private debt” is the primary label the institutional market now uses. For a borrower, the rename is shorthand for the same structural shift: these are no longer niche providers filling a gap the banks left. They are a standing part of the capital market.
As rates rose through 2022, did deal terms for borrowers get materially worse?
Yes on pricing, more modestly on other terms. Base rate passed through directly (most direct-lending facilities carry floating SONIA-linked margins), so the all-in cost of a new facility rose materially during 2022. On structural terms (leverage multiples, covenant packages, amortisation) the adjustment was more measured, particularly for quality credits where lenders competed to win the business. The gap between a one-lender process and a competitive one widened as pricing dispersion increased.

Double opt-in. Quarterly at most, and you can unsubscribe from any edition.