Refinancing

The Covid loan book has a countdown

By late 2024, most CBILS facilities were well advanced in repayment and Bounce Back loans were grinding through their final years. The settled-claims line, the taxpayer's realised loss, kept climbing toward the 2026 maturity peak.

Dated
19 September 2024
Desk note
Dated to the data
Reading
6 min
Gregory Elgunov, Managing Director of Solon Corporate Finance

Managing Director

Gregory Elgunov

At mid-2024, well over half of BBLS facilities were still amortising on schedule toward a 2026 six-year final maturity — neither repaid nor defaulted, but closing on a date. CBILS was further advanced, with roughly 40% of facilities fully repaid. The settled-claims line, the government’s realised guarantee cost, had already climbed from £7.4bn to approaching £10bn. The book is not resolved. It has a countdown.

How large is the book that still needs to resolve?

The three pandemic schemes drew a combined £77bn between March 2020 and March 2021: BBLS (£46.5bn, ~1.5m businesses), CBILS (£25.8bn, ~109,000 businesses) and CLBILS (£4.5bn, ~750 larger businesses). Four years on, the book had not quietly resolved itself. CLBILS, which served larger companies on shorter facilities, was the furthest advanced and by mid-2024 was effectively wound down. CBILS was moving steadily through repayment. BBLS was the laggard, because its six-year original term kept the majority of the 2020 cohort in-flight until 2026 unless Pay As You Grow extensions had been taken.

Pay As You Grow, the government’s 2021 package of flexible repayment options for BBLS borrowers, allowed businesses to extend to ten years, take repayment holidays or move to interest-only for limited periods. Roughly 35% of BBLS businesses used at least one PAYG option, which pushed a meaningful slice of the original 2026 maturities further out toward 2030. The remaining 65% are on their original schedule.

Fig. 01

Most Bounce Back loans are neither repaid nor defaulted: they are amortising on schedule toward a 2026 final maturity.

Bounce Back Loan Scheme: share of facilities 'on schedule' vs 'settled claims', by volume, Jun 2023 – Jun 2024A line chart of Bounce Back Loan facility status from June 2023 to June 2024. The 'on schedule' share declines from 64.8% to an illustrative 57%; settled claims (government guarantees paid out after default) rise from 14.5% toward an illustrative 21.5%.0%50%Jun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Jun 2024
Bounce Back Loan facility status, share by volume of facilities, quarterly Jun 2023 to Jun 2024 (per cent).
QuarterOn schedule (%)Settled claims (%)
Jun 202364.8%14.5%
Sep 202362.9%15.8%
Dec 202361.1%18.4%
Jun 202457%21.5%
  • Still 'on schedule'
  • Settled claims (guarantee paid out)

Share of Bounce Back Loan facilities by furthest life-event, by volume. Jun 2023 and Dec 2023 are gov.uk hard releases; the Sep 2023 point is a linear interpolation between them, and the Jun 2024 point is a trend extrapolation beyond the last published release. Both are marked illustrative. BBLS original term was six years from drawdown (mostly 2020), so final maturities land through 2026 unless extended under Pay As You Grow.

Source · HM Treasury / British Business Bank, Bounce Back Loan Scheme performance data (quarterly, by volume of facilities)

~57%

Illustrative share of BBLS facilities still 'on schedule' as at mid-2024, heading into the final 18 months before the 2020 vintage reaches its original six-year term.

Source · Solon estimate from HM Treasury / BBB quarterly BBLS repayment data; Jun 2023 hard (64.8%), Dec 2023 hard (61.2%), June 2024 extrapolated.

What does the CBILS picture look like?

CBILS businesses are a more varied group. The scheme ran from March 2020 to March 2021 and covered facilities from £50,000 to £5m, with terms of three to six years. Three-year CBILS facilities were therefore already reaching their original maturity dates through 2023–24, which is why the fully-repaid share of CBILS was advancing much faster than BBLS: from 30% of facilities in June 2023 toward an estimated 39% by mid-2024. The on-schedule share was falling correspondingly as those shorter-term facilities closed out.

For the lower-mid-market borrower, where CBILS tickets of £1m–£5m were common, the practical question by autumn 2024 was straightforward: if a six-year CBILS facility was drawn in mid-2020, it matured in mid-2026. The lead time to organise a refinancing from a position of strength was already compressing.

Fig. 02

CBILS repayment progress: nearly 40% of facilities fully repaid by mid-2024, but half still running.

CBILS facility status: fully repaid and on-schedule shares at June 2023 and June 2024A column chart comparing CBILS fully repaid and on-schedule shares at two snapshots: June 2023 (30% repaid, 63% on schedule) and an illustrative June 2024 (39% repaid, 51% on schedule, highlighted). The on-schedule share is declining as facilities approach or pass their original maturity dates.0%50%30%Repaid Jun 2363%On schedule Jun 2339%Repaid Jun 2451%On schedule Jun 24
CBILS facility status by volume (per cent), Jun 2023 and Jun 2024.
Status / DateShare of facilities (%)
Repaid Jun 2330%
On schedule Jun 2363%
Repaid Jun 2439%
On schedule Jun 2451%
  • Highlighted: illustrative Jun 2024 repaid share
  • Remaining series

CBILS (Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme) by volume of facilities. Jun 2023 is a hard gov.uk figure (30 Jun 2023 release). Jun 2024 is a trend extrapolation beyond the last published release, projected from the Jun 2023 endpoint at the observed rate of CBILS repayment, and is flagged illustrative. On-schedule share is the complement of repaid + arrears + defaulted + settled. CBILS facilities ran up to £5m, 80% government-guaranteed.

Source · HM Treasury / British Business Bank, CBILS performance data (quarterly, by volume of facilities)

The Jun 2024 CBILS columns are extrapolated from the hard Jun 2023 release at the observed repayment rate. The on-schedule share declined faster as shorter-term facilities closed.

What should a borrower with an outstanding Covid facility do now?

The first step is to locate the exact final maturity date on the facility letter, which is not always the same as the last scheduled repayment instalment. BBLS borrowers who did not use Pay As You Grow should assume a 2026 final maturity. CBILS borrowers should check where in the three-to-six-year range their term sits; the population spans the full range, and the date differs by up to three years.

A Covid facility approaching its final maturity is not a problem to be managed. It is a refinancing event to be planned.

From there, the logic is the same as any planned refinancing: begin twelve to eighteen months ahead, prepare the credit story as if the lender had never seen the business, and run a competitive process. The Covid balance does not disqualify a well-performing borrower; it is a disclosed liability that any lender in this market expects to see. What disqualifies a borrower is arriving late, with a compressed timeline and no alternatives to the incumbent bank. That pressure is entirely avoidable for anyone who starts in 2024 rather than 2026.

The rising settled-claims line in the BBLS data, approaching £10bn of realised government payouts by mid-2024, is a measure of the cohort that did not navigate this. For the majority still on schedule, it is a reminder that the wall is not hypothetical.

Questions a CFO asks

Common questions

How do I know if my CBILS or Bounce Back facility is approaching its final maturity?
The original term was six years from drawdown for BBLS and typically three to six years for CBILS. A BBLS drawn in May 2020 reaches final maturity in May 2026 unless Pay As You Grow was used to extend to ten years, which pushes the tail out to 2030. CBILS facilities written on three-year terms were already reaching their original maturity by 2023–24; those on six-year terms follow in 2026–27. Check the facility letter for the exact final maturity date; it is not always the same as the last scheduled repayment.
Does having a Covid scheme loan outstanding affect my ability to refinance?
A Covid-scheme balance is a disclosed liability in any refinancing process, but it does not disqualify the borrower. Lenders refinancing the lower-mid-market in 2024 are well accustomed to businesses carrying a residual BBLS or CBILS balance, and a clean repayment track record on the scheme loan is itself a positive data point. The more important question is whether the aggregate debt stack, scheme balance plus any new facility, is serviceable at current rates and what the repayment waterfall looks like across all facilities.
What is a 'settled claim' in the Covid loan data, and why does it matter?
A settled claim means the government paid the lender's guarantee after the borrower defaulted. It is the closest available proxy for realised losses to the taxpayer, distinct from loans still in arrears (where loss has not yet crystallised) or suspected fraud (under investigation but not yet finalised). The settled-claims share was 14.5% of BBLS facilities in June 2023 and has kept rising steadily toward the 2026 maturity peak. For a borrower, the relevance is indirect: a rising loss rate signals how the lender community views Covid-era credit quality and how carefully they will scrutinise businesses with outstanding scheme balances seeking to refinance.

Double opt-in. Quarterly at most, and you can unsubscribe from any edition.